Homily for 1st Sunday of Lent Year A 2023
Introduction
Sin! Nobody wants to talk about sin. I am sure you are not looking forward to hearing
a homily about sin. I can assure you that I too don't want to talk about
sin. But sin is the subject of our
readings today, particularly the passage about the sin of Adam and Eve in our
first reading.
One reason we don't hear much about sin is
because we have replaced the word with euphemisms. There is a story about a father who was taking
a walk with his teenage son. And they
came upon two people on a park bench involved in a sinful act. The young man quickly said, "Dad, that
is not cool." So for him, sin was
simply "something not cool."
As for the dad who was in his forties,
looking at the same act said, "that is inappropriate." Even he couldn't bring himself to call the
act, sin; the act was merely inappropriate.
But when they got back home and were describing the incident to grandpa,
it was he who finally said "that is wrong." And so we have come from grandpa's generation
which saw sin as wrong, to ours which sees sin as only inappropriate and now
our children who see sin as "not-cool."
Scripture and Theology
But sin is a reality. It was a reality for our first parents, it is
a reality now. What Adam and Eve did,
was not merely "uncool" or merely inappropriate; it was a sin. What was their sin, I hear you asking? Thank you for asking.
Our reading began with God giving Adam and
Eve two precious gifts. First, he gave
them life. Think about it; he did not
have to create them, but create them he did.
Then, he gave them a lush garden in Eden full of all manner of trees,
including the tree of knowledge in the centre.
He allowed them to make use of the trees in the garden. But he asked for one little, tiny thing:
"You shall not eat it [the tree in
the middle of the garden] or even touch it, lest you die." And so Adam and Eve found themselves before a
loving God, who gave them all they needed, and some rules, like a good parent
does for children.
So how did Adam and Eve come to sin,
despite being in this most enviable paradise?
Well, what do you know! The serpent, described as "the most cunning of all the animals"
comes to Eve and says that if she eats of the fruit of the tree, she will most
certainly not die. "No, God knows
well that the moment you eat of it your eyes will be opened and you will be
like gods who know what is good and what is evil.” The Devil is tricky; he
downplays the downside that is death and magnifies the upside, knowledge. Spare a thought for poor Eve; if you were
presented with such a proposition, a chance to have the key to knowing what is
good and evil, would you not at least consider it? And as we heard, Eve was convinced and saw
three good things in the tree. It "was good for food, pleasing to the eyes, and
desirable for gaining wisdom."
The Tempter will use these same three goods
against Jesus in today's gospel: "good for food," the temptation of
bodily pleasure, "pleasing to the eyes," the temptation of
possessions, and "desirable for gaining wisdom," the temptation of
power. Of course, Jesus will triumph over
them, but Eve did not. She ate the fruit
of the tree and gave some to her husband as well.
Eve therefore sins, not only because she
disobeys a direct command of God, who forbade her to eat or even touch the
tree; she sins also and especially because she assigns to herself the role of
deciding what is the true good. She
chooses an apparent good over the true good, a lesser good over the greater
good, something else over God, who is goodness itself. It is this desire to be the masters of our
own destiny, the deciders of what is good and evil, or what is the greater good
and the lesser good, that is the original sin.
If the first reading was a step-by-step
guide in how to sin, the gospel passage is a case study in how to avoid
sin. While Eve’s temptation took place
in the lush garden of Eden, that of Jesus takes place in the dry desert of
Judah, where he is presented with virtually the same proposition and three apparent
goods.
Considering that he was hungry after
fasting for forty days and forty nights, the first crack at him by the Tempter
was particularly attractive: "If you
are the Son of God, command that these stones become loaves of bread,"
Eve's good for food. Later in the gospel
Jesus will be in the business of making bread out of nothing for the crowds and
will change water into wine at Cana wedding.
And so what the Tempter is asking him to do, is actually somewhat of a
good thing.
But if Jesus chooses to obey him, he would
be abandoning an even better good, his need to rely on God. He would be taking a short-cut, rather than
the way of the cross; he would be nothing more than a magician; he would not be
a true messiah. That is why Jesus tells
the Tempter: "One does not live on
bread alone, but on every word that comes forth from the mouth of God." In other words, trusting in God is greater
than immediate gratification.
The second temptation from the Devil is:
"If you are the Son of God, throw
yourself down" from the temple roof, from God's dwelling place, since
Scripture says that God will protect you. This proposition places before Jesus
the choice of trusting in God unreservedly or obtaining a little proof that the
Father cares for him. Moreover, jumping
down from the temple roof and surviving the experience would have been an
excellent opportunity for Jesus to show his divine power and win over many people. But since doing this would be also be testing
God for his own purposes, the equivalent of Eve's desire for knowledge and
wisdom apart from God, Jesus rejected this temptation saying: “You shall not put the Lord your God to the
test.”
The third temptation provides Jesus with
another shortcut to power that avoids the suffering of the cross. "All
these [kingdoms of the world] I shall give to you, if you will prostrate
yourself and worship me" proposes the Tempter. And this was not an empty promise. Jesus had come to take the world from Satan's
control. Should he do it through the
arduous way of suffering and death on the cross, or should he take easy way
proposed by the tempter?
But again unlike Eve who chose what was
pleasing to the eyes, Jesus chose the greater good and not the lesser
good. He says, thanks but no
thanks. Quoting from Scripture he says:
"The Lord, your God, shall you
worship and him alone shall you serve." He chooses to worship God above all else.
Christian Life
And so my friends, as we begin our Lenten
journey of repenting from sin we have to be aware that the greatest temptation
of all is not the ugliness of sin, but its attractive nature, especially when
we think of ourselves as the ultimate arbiters of what is truly good, and so are
deceived by what is apparently good.
In our daily lives we make choices, some
big, some small. What makes these daily
choices particularly difficult is not that we have to choose between what is clearly
evil and what is clearly good; that is a fairly easy to do. The difficulty is that often both choices before
us appear to contain some good and we must decide which is the true good. And if we rely only on our own feelings and
wants, without relying on God, we shall most certainly choose the lesser
good. That is why the Catechism (1849)
tells us that "Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right
conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbour caused by a
perverse attachment to certain goods."
Let us be watchful against this last part, that attachment to certain
lesser goods.
And so, avoiding sin is not just about
obeying rules, but also about allowing God to help us choose what is truly good
over what is only apparently good. It
could be the choice between watching TV or saying my rosary, the choice between
helping someone in need or bypassing them, the choice between being faithful to
my spouse or cheating on her, the choice between keeping quiet in the face of
evil or speaking against it; do we choose the true good?
Conclusion
Like the 40 days Jesus spent in the desert
may our Lenten experience of 40 days be observed through sincere fasting, generous
almsgiving and ardent prayer and lead us to realize that only God can offer us
what is "[1] good for food
and [2] pleasing to the eyes, and [3] desirable for gaining wisdom." Most of all, let us allow this
Eucharist, the highest good, bring us closer to God.